<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft acquires Xobni, good or bad?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laurent.pierssens.com/2008/04/18/microsoft-acquires-xobni-good-or-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laurent.pierssens.com/2008/04/18/microsoft-acquires-xobni-good-or-bad/</link>
	<description>about the web, technology, business and startups</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 11:18:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Confirmation of Microsoft&#8217;s intent to buy Xobni &#124; Thoughtlets</title>
		<link>http://laurent.pierssens.com/2008/04/18/microsoft-acquires-xobni-good-or-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Confirmation of Microsoft&#8217;s intent to buy Xobni &#124; Thoughtlets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurent.pierssens.com/?p=59#comment-22</guid>
		<description>[...] Arrington has provided independent confirmation of Laurent Féral-Pierssens&#8217; earlier speculation about Microsoft acquiring Xobni. Looks like your comments may have been right on the money, Laurent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Arrington has provided independent confirmation of Laurent Féral-Pierssens&#8217; earlier speculation about Microsoft acquiring Xobni. Looks like your comments may have been right on the money, Laurent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurent&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft signs LoI to acquire Xobni [follow-up]</title>
		<link>http://laurent.pierssens.com/2008/04/18/microsoft-acquires-xobni-good-or-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurent&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft signs LoI to acquire Xobni [follow-up]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurent.pierssens.com/?p=59#comment-21</guid>
		<description>[...] As a follow-up to my post on friday, there is now independent confirmation that Microsoft has signed at least its side of a Letter of Intent to acquire Xobni. The price on that letter is unknown for the moment and would likely be above an initial offer of less than $20 million.  addthis_url = &#039;http%3A%2F%2Flaurent.pierssens.com%2F2008%2F04%2F21%2Fmicrosoft-signs-loi-to-acquire-xobni-confirmed%2F&#039;; addthis_title = &#039;Microsoft+signs+LoI+to+acquire+Xobni+%5Bfollow-up%5D&#039;; addthis_pub = &#039;lfp&#039;; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As a follow-up to my post on friday, there is now independent confirmation that Microsoft has signed at least its side of a Letter of Intent to acquire Xobni. The price on that letter is unknown for the moment and would likely be above an initial offer of less than $20 million.  addthis_url = &#8216;http%3A%2F%2Flaurent.pierssens.com%2F2008%2F04%2F21%2Fmicrosoft-signs-loi-to-acquire-xobni-confirmed%2F&#8217;; addthis_title = &#8216;Microsoft+signs+LoI+to+acquire+Xobni+%5Bfollow-up%5D&#8217;; addthis_pub = &#8216;lfp&#8217;; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Lampert</title>
		<link>http://laurent.pierssens.com/2008/04/18/microsoft-acquires-xobni-good-or-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Lampert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurent.pierssens.com/?p=59#comment-19</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s unfortunate that you don&#039;t provide indication of its source, nor any way of verifying your claims. Anything more you can say?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s unfortunate that you don&#8217;t provide indication of its source, nor any way of verifying your claims. Anything more you can say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurent FP</title>
		<link>http://laurent.pierssens.com/2008/04/18/microsoft-acquires-xobni-good-or-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurent FP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurent.pierssens.com/?p=59#comment-17</guid>
		<description>In a way, I wish it was just misinformation especially because I would love to see Xobni stay private. We&#039;ll have to wait for the official details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a way, I wish it was just misinformation especially because I would love to see Xobni stay private. We&#8217;ll have to wait for the official details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Fain</title>
		<link>http://laurent.pierssens.com/2008/04/18/microsoft-acquires-xobni-good-or-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Fain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurent.pierssens.com/?p=59#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Mmm, it seems to be pure misinformation. I started to believe this but it appears it&#039;s just wrong: XOBNI, to this day, is still independent, and I wish XOBNI a happy growth stage &amp; IPO in a few years of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmm, it seems to be pure misinformation. I started to believe this but it appears it&#8217;s just wrong: XOBNI, to this day, is still independent, and I wish XOBNI a happy growth stage &amp; IPO in a few years of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy</title>
		<link>http://laurent.pierssens.com/2008/04/18/microsoft-acquires-xobni-good-or-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurent.pierssens.com/?p=59#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Now where did you pick this up? Really would like to see another source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now where did you pick this up? Really would like to see another source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
